$799,000 GREY SUITE-ARB

6950 Porpoise Dr, Sandy Hook
4 bd · 1.5 ba · 1,984 sqft · 8,485 sqft lot · built 1983 · 3 DOM · MLS R3151789
Ocean view Oil-tank era
Redfin ↗
Listing: Redfin search · fetched 2026-08-03T07:15

Description

Rarely does a home in this price range offer panoramic Sechelt Inlet views, peaceful surroundings and the relaxed coastal lifestyle that make Sandy Hook one of the Sunshine Coast's most cherished communities. Lovingly maintained, this 4-bedroom, 2-bathroom home offers comfortable main-floor living, with a largely unfinished lower level ready to make your own. Create additional living space, a studio or generous storage. Large windows fill the home with natural light, while the covered deck captures sweeping inlet and mountain views. Quiet streets, friendly neighbours, nearby hiking trails, kayaking, swimming and easy access to downtown Sechelt complete this exceptional lifestyle. Seller wil
From listing remarks (RE/MAX City Realty)

Rating 17 /100 · incomplete data — ceiling 29

Equity
0/40 no ARV — unscored
Cash flow
0/30 -1,050/mo
Suite-arb
15.0/15 add-a-suite opportunity, unpriced
Motivation
2.2/15 3d on market, no cuts — anchored seller, asking 120% of assessed

Offer case

Price can't fix this. no ARV or rent estimate — cannot solve

EVIDENCE

  • Coast-wide, homes sell at 97.6% of list — a 2.4% discount is simply normal here.
  • Only 3 days on market — too fresh for a big discount.
  • Asking only 120% of assessed value — a genuine discount to the roll, not the usual 1-2%.
Support score 0.0 — evidence weight that this seller would entertain the discount. Not a prediction; a checklist with numbers.

The four tests

Equity — UNKNOWN
(price + $40,000 reno + PTT+legal closing) <= 85% x ARV
all-in = $799,000 + $40,000 + $16,480 = $855,480 ARV = — → limit = 85% × ARV = — margin = —
Rent — UNKNOWN
est. rent >= 0.40% x ARV
est. rent = $3,400/mo (whole house (4bd) $3,400) floor = 0.4% × ARV — = —/mo rents table: Sechelt · as of 2026-08-02
Cash flow — FAIL
rent - carrying >= -800/mo (PM-managed, typical rent, at ask)
payment $3,201 (loan $639,200 @ 4.4%/30y) + tax $411 (mls) + ins $158 + maint $170 + vac $204 + PM $306 carrying = $4,450/mo · rent $3,400 → cash flow = $-1,050/mo (floor $-800)
Suite-arb — PASS
zone permits suite AND sqft >= 1,900 AND no suite language AND $/sqft < community median
zone R-1 suite:yes · sqft 1,984 (min 1,900) suite language: no · $/sqft 403 vs median 489
Scored 2026-08-03T08:50 · thresholds from criteria.yaml

Cash-flow scenarios $/mo · hover a cell for carrying cost

Price $3,400 typical
self-managed
$3,400 typical
PM
$3,900 high
self-managed
$3,900 high
PM
$799,000 −$744 −$1,050 −$299 −$650
$759,050 −5.0% −$584 −$890 −$139 −$490
$731,085 −8.5% −$472 −$778 −$27 −$378
Rents: rents.yaml as of 2026-08-02 · financing from criteria.yaml

Comps & ARV

No ARV yet — 3 comps within 3.0km but only 1 within ±30% of 1,984 sqft — no ARV rather than a bad one. (3 solds nearby; comps backfill runs nightly.)

Solds from Redfin sold-search + public-records sale prices (belowTheFold)

Price & sale history

Seller basis: $310,000, 2004-08-17 — asking +157.7%

2026-08-03new 799000 first seen at $799,000
2026-07-31Listed $799,000 GVR
2004-08-17Sold (Public Records) $310,000 Public Records
2004-06-21Listed $319,900 GVR
1981-06-15Sold (Public Records) $36,000 Public Records
History: Redfin belowTheFold · fetched 2026-08-03T07:15 · events observed by Coastwatch

Zoning & land

R-1 — Large Lot, Low Density Residential suite OK

Single-unit dwelling zone in all three bylaws, but the suite path differs. Areas B/D/E/F: suite permitted on any parcel EXCEPT inside an SCRD wastewater service area — check that first, it is the one thing that kills it outright. Also an auxiliary dwelling unit over 2000 m2 and a second single-unit dwelling over 3500 m2. Area A: no general suite right at all; an auxiliary dwelling unit needs over 2000 m2, a second dwelling needs 4000 m2. Sechelt R-1: secondary suite is a listed accessory use, plus a detached accessory dwelling unit at 2000 m2 and up (unsewered large-lot zone). [Bylaw 722.9 s.5.1.1(h), s.5.24.1, s.7.1.2; Bylaw 337 s.601.1; Bylaw 580 s.1.1.2-1.1.3]

  • Rocky Beach Front, Escarpments and Slope Hazards — Steep-slope DPA: a geotechnical engineer's report is required for foundation work. This is the one that most often kills a lower-level suite excavation.
  • Slope greater than 20% to 30% — Steep-slope DPA: a geotechnical engineer's report is required for foundation work. This is the one that most often kills a lower-level suite excavation.
PID028-751-957
Parcel6954 PORPOISE DR (Sechelt)
WastewaterDistrict of Sechelt sewer service
WaterChapman system
Fire protectionSechelt FPA
District of Sechelt Zoning Bylaw 580 (gis.sechelt.ca) · fetched 2026-08-03T05:42 · meanings from zoning_rules.yaml (verify before relying)

Assessment

Assessed total$960,000
Land / improvements $679,000 / $281,000 (71% land — the higher, the more the value is in the dirt)
Assessed / ask 1.2 asking under assessment
BCA folio570.06738.176
BC Assessment via SCRD parcel layer · fetched 2026-08-03T05:55

Open questions

  • Confirm suite legality with the planning department — zone says yes, verify parcel specifics (parking, servicing, floor-area cap).
  • Built 1983 — oil-tank era. Ask for a tank scan or decommissioning certificate.
  • Rocky Beach Front, Escarpments and Slope Hazards: Steep-slope DPA: a geotechnical engineer's report is required for foundation work. This is the one that most often kills a lower-level suite excavation.
  • Slope greater than 20% to 30%: Steep-slope DPA: a geotechnical engineer's report is required for foundation work. This is the one that most often kills a lower-level suite excavation.

Notes