$799,000 GREY SUITE-ARB

5309 Cedarview Pl, Selma Park
3 bd · 3.0 ba · 2,240 sqft · 9,170 sqft lot · built 1992 · 44 DOM · MLS R3143438
Redfin ↗
Listing: Redfin search · fetched 2026-08-21T07:15

Description

A meticulously maintained, level-entry rancher with a one bedroom suite below. This bright, open-concept home boasts a spacious living room with gleaming maple hardwood floors, a cozy natural gas fireplace, and charming bay windows. The main floor includes a generous primary bedroom complete with a full ensuite and walk-in closet. Step out from the dining area onto a large, covered deck which overlooks landscaped gardens featuring mature fruit trees, flowering shrubs, and lawn. The fully finished lower level offers a versatile one-bedroom plus den suite, ideal for guests, rental income, or extended family living. This move-in ready home offers outstanding curb appeal and a fantastic locatio
From listing remarks (RE/MAX Oceanview Realty)

Rating 36 /100

Equity
18.1/40 -263 vs limit (-0.0% of ARV)
Cash flow
0/30 -1,416/mo
Suite-arb
15.0/15 add-a-suite opportunity, unpriced
Motivation
3.1/15 46d on market, 1 relist(s)

Offer case

Price can't fix this. rent test — needs 4,025/mo vs 3,000 estimated. Price cannot fix this; only higher rent (a suite) or a lower ARV would.

EVIDENCE

  • Coast-wide, homes sell at 97.6% of list — a 2.4% discount is simply normal here.
  • 1 previous failed listing(s) — this seller has been here before.
  • Already asking below the $499/sqft local sold level — little room to push.
Support score 0.0 — evidence weight that this seller would entertain the discount. Not a prediction; a checklist with numbers.

The four tests

Equity — FAIL
(price + $40,000 reno + PTT+legal closing) <= 85% x ARV
all-in = $799,000 + $40,000 + $16,480 = $855,480 ARV = $1,006,138 → limit = 85% × ARV = $855,217 margin = $-263 · at band low ($758,310): $-210,916 — GREEN needs this ≥ 0
Rent — FAIL
est. rent >= 0.40% x ARV
est. rent = $3,000/mo (whole house (3bd) $3,000) floor = 0.4% × ARV $1,006,138 = $4,025/mo rents table: Sechelt · as of 2026-08-02
Cash flow — FAIL
rent - carrying >= -800/mo (PM-managed, typical rent, at ask)
payment $3,201 (loan $639,200 @ 4.4%/30y) + tax $457 (mls) + ins $158 + maint $150 + vac $180 + PM $270 carrying = $4,416/mo · rent $3,000 → cash flow = $-1,416/mo (floor $-800)
Suite-arb — PASS
zone permits suite AND sqft >= 1,900 AND no suite language AND $/sqft < community median
zone R-1 suite:yes · sqft 2,240 (min 1,900) suite language: no · $/sqft 357 vs median 493
Scored 2026-08-21T00:55 · thresholds from criteria.yaml

Cash-flow scenarios $/mo · hover a cell for carrying cost

Price $3,000 typical
self-managed
$3,000 typical
PM
$3,450 high
self-managed
$3,450 high
PM
$799,000 −$1,146 −$1,416 −$745 −$1,056
$759,050 −5.0% −$986 −$1,256 −$585 −$896
$731,085 −8.5% −$874 −$1,144 −$473 −$784
Rents: rents.yaml as of 2026-08-02 · financing from criteria.yaml

Comps & ARV

ARV $1,006,138 range $758,310 – $1,151,330 (about half of comparable sales landed inside this band)
median $/sqft of 12 renovated size-matched sales (12 priced from list × measured sale ratio — ~3y registration lag), blended 70%/30% with assessed × 1.03 (sale/assessed, renovated) · confidence medium ($/sqft used: 475)

Cross-check: comps say $1,064,000, BC Assessment × sale ratio says $871,128 (+22% apart)

SoldDistSqftPrice$/sqftDateReno
4967 Laurel Ave 1.42 km2,039 ~$820,078 4022026-02-23✓
6242 Norwest Bay Rd 3.91 km1,707 ~$671,275 3932025-10-19✓
6355 Baillie Rd 4.0 km2,288 ~$1,220,500 5332026-01-22✓
5656 Cook Pl 4.59 km2,330 ~$876,807 3762026-05-19✓
7462 Redrooffs Rd 9.11 km2,851 ~$828,964 2912025-10-23✓
7955 Connor Rd 10.43 km1,746 ~$828,964 4752025-09-16✓
9196 Truman Rd 14.98 km2,139 ~$1,318,140 6162025-09-03✓
962 Cemetery Rd 16.15 km1,916 ~$1,049,630 5482025-11-28✓
~ = final list price × measured sale ratio (BC title registration lags ~3 years, so recent solds have no registered price; the proxy is within ~2% of the registered price when both exist)
Solds from Redfin sold-search + public-records sale prices (belowTheFold)

Price & sale history

Seller basis: $409,000, 2012-01-16 — asking +95.4%

2026-08-21delisted absent from search results
2026-08-03new 799000 first seen at $799,000
2026-07-06Listed $799,000 GVR
2024-01-08Listed $889,900 GVR
2012-01-16Sold (Public Records) $409,000 Public Records
2011-05-30Listed $419,900 GVR
2000-07-19Sold (Public Records) $186,000 Public Records
1996-02-28Sold (Public Records) $195,000 Public Records
History: Redfin belowTheFold · fetched 2026-08-20T19:16 · events observed by Coastwatch

Zoning & land

R-1 — Large Lot, Low Density Residential suite OK

Single-unit dwelling zone in all three bylaws, but the suite path differs. Areas B/D/E/F: suite permitted on any parcel EXCEPT inside an SCRD wastewater service area — check that first, it is the one thing that kills it outright. Also an auxiliary dwelling unit over 2000 m2 and a second single-unit dwelling over 3500 m2. Area A: no general suite right at all; an auxiliary dwelling unit needs over 2000 m2, a second dwelling needs 4000 m2. Sechelt R-1: secondary suite is a listed accessory use, plus a detached accessory dwelling unit at 2000 m2 and up (unsewered large-lot zone). [Bylaw 722.9 s.5.1.1(h), s.5.24.1, s.7.1.2; Bylaw 337 s.601.1; Bylaw 580 s.1.1.2-1.1.3]

  • Slope greater than 20% to 30% — Steep-slope DPA: a geotechnical engineer's report is required for foundation work. This is the one that most often kills a lower-level suite excavation.
  • Slope greater than 30% — Steep-slope DPA: a geotechnical engineer's report is required for foundation work. This is the one that most often kills a lower-level suite excavation.
PID017-714-133
Parcel5309 CEDARVIEW PL (Sechelt)
WastewaterDistrict of Sechelt sewer service
WaterChapman system
Fire protectionSechelt FPA
District of Sechelt Zoning Bylaw 580 (gis.sechelt.ca) · fetched 2026-08-03T05:43 · meanings from zoning_rules.yaml (verify before relying)

Assessment

Assessed total$872,000
Land / improvements $505,000 / $367,000 (58% land — the higher, the more the value is in the dirt)
Assessed / ask 1.09 asking under assessment
BCA folio570.04653.103
BC Assessment via SCRD parcel layer · fetched 2026-08-03T05:55

Open questions

  • Confirm suite legality with the planning department — zone says yes, verify parcel specifics (parking, servicing, floor-area cap).
  • Slope greater than 20% to 30%: Steep-slope DPA: a geotechnical engineer's report is required for foundation work. This is the one that most often kills a lower-level suite excavation.
  • Slope greater than 30%: Steep-slope DPA: a geotechnical engineer's report is required for foundation work. This is the one that most often kills a lower-level suite excavation.
  • 44 days on market — ask the listing agent why it hasn't moved.

Notes