$775,000 GREY SUITE-ARB

5225B Sunshine Coast Hwy, Selma Park
— bd · — ba · 2,000 sqft · 13,697 sqft lot · built 1900 · 161 DOM · MLS R3092747
Fixer / handymanOcean viewWaterfront Oil-tank era
Redfin ↗
Listing: Redfin search · fetched 2026-08-03T07:15

Description

Waterfront and sunset lovers. .. Looking for a project? This is an opportunity! a couple of old shacks on a gorgeous waterfront property with an incredible ocean view with a spectacular swimming beach. This property requires of alot of TLC and is priced accordingly. So much potential minutes to Sechelt amenities. This West facing lot enjoys beautiful sunsets and a gorgeous oceanfront setting. Do not access the property it is overgrown and steps not secure. To view call listing agents for access details.
From listing remarks (Sutton Group-West Coast Realty)

Rating 29 /100

Equity
11.0/40 -37,032 vs limit (-4.0% of ARV)
Cash flow
0/30 -2,370/mo
Suite-arb
15.0/15 add-a-suite opportunity, unpriced
Motivation
3.0/15 161d on market, no cuts — anchored seller

Offer case

Price can't fix this. rent test — needs 3,736/mo vs 1,700 estimated. Price cannot fix this; only higher rent (a suite) or a lower ARV would.

EVIDENCE

  • Coast-wide, homes sell at 97.6% of list — a 2.4% discount is simply normal here.
  • 161 days on market vs a 59-day median — but ZERO price cuts, so this reads as an anchored seller, not a motivated one.
  • ARV confidence is LOW (thin or unrenovated comps) — the target price below could be off by 10%+ in either direction.
Support score 0.0 — evidence weight that this seller would entertain the discount. Not a prediction; a checklist with numbers.

The four tests

Equity — FAIL
(price + $40,000 reno + PTT+legal closing) <= 85% x ARV
all-in = $775,000 + $40,000 + $16,000 = $831,000 ARV = $934,080 → limit = 85% × ARV = $793,968 margin = $-37,032
Rent — FAIL
est. rent >= 0.40% x ARV
est. rent = $1,700/mo (0-bed dwelling (1bd-suite tier) $1,700) floor = 0.4% × ARV $934,080 = $3,736/mo rents table: Sechelt · as of 2026-08-02
Cash flow — FAIL
rent - carrying >= -800/mo (PM-managed, typical rent, at ask)
payment $3,105 (loan $620,000 @ 4.4%/30y) + tax $467 (mls) + ins $158 + maint $85 + vac $102 + PM $153 carrying = $4,070/mo · rent $1,700 → cash flow = $-2,370/mo (floor $-800)
Suite-arb — PASS
zone permits suite AND sqft >= 1,900 AND no suite language AND $/sqft < community median
zone R-1 suite:yes · sqft 2,000 (min 1,900) suite language: no · $/sqft 388 vs median 489
Scored 2026-08-03T08:57 · thresholds from criteria.yaml

Cash-flow scenarios $/mo · hover a cell for carrying cost

Price $1,700 typical
self-managed
$1,700 typical
PM
$2,000 high
self-managed
$2,000 high
PM
$775,000 −$2,217 −$2,370 −$1,950 −$2,130
$736,250 −5.0% −$2,062 −$2,215 −$1,795 −$1,975
$709,125 −8.5% −$1,954 −$2,107 −$1,687 −$1,867
Rents: rents.yaml as of 2026-08-02 · financing from criteria.yaml

Comps & ARV

ARV $934,080 — median $/sqft of 12 size-matched comps x 112% reno uplift (only 1 renovated comps found) · confidence low ($/sqft used: 417)

SoldDistSqftPrice$/sqftDateReno
5201 Havies Rd 1.05 km1,697 ~$1,244,145 7332026-05-11
4967 Laurel Ave 1.27 km2,039 ~$819,574 4022026-02-23
5457 Burley Pl 2.01 km2,090 ~$902,614 4322026-02-02
5613 Trail Ave 2.13 km1,483 ~$584,504 3942025-11-21
5693 Porpoise Bay Rd 2.25 km2,448 ~$683,060 2792026-01-27
5005 Bay Rd 2.27 km1,975 ~$1,414,910 7162025-10-21
5628 Medusa Pl 2.46 km2,353 ~$1,072,404 4562026-03-24
5799 Anchor Rd 2.67 km1,656 ~$517,076 3122026-04-20
~ = final list price used as sale proxy (BC title registration lags ~6-12 mo)
Solds from Redfin sold-search + public-records sale prices (belowTheFold)

Price & sale history

Seller basis: $290,000, 2003-10-01 — asking +167.2%

2026-08-03new 775000 first seen at $775,000
2026-04-30Price Changed $775,000 GVR
2026-02-23Listed $825,000 GVR
2003-10-01Sold (Public Records) $290,000 Public Records
1973-10-15Sold (Public Records) $44,000 Public Records
History: Redfin belowTheFold · fetched 2026-08-03T07:46 · events observed by Coastwatch

Zoning & land

R-1 — Large Lot, Low Density Residential suite OK

Single-unit dwelling zone in all three bylaws, but the suite path differs. Areas B/D/E/F: suite permitted on any parcel EXCEPT inside an SCRD wastewater service area — check that first, it is the one thing that kills it outright. Also an auxiliary dwelling unit over 2000 m2 and a second single-unit dwelling over 3500 m2. Area A: no general suite right at all; an auxiliary dwelling unit needs over 2000 m2, a second dwelling needs 4000 m2. Sechelt R-1: secondary suite is a listed accessory use, plus a detached accessory dwelling unit at 2000 m2 and up (unsewered large-lot zone). [Bylaw 722.9 s.5.1.1(h), s.5.24.1, s.7.1.2; Bylaw 337 s.601.1; Bylaw 580 s.1.1.2-1.1.3]

  • Rocky Beach Front, Escarpments and Slope Hazards — Steep-slope DPA: a geotechnical engineer's report is required for foundation work. This is the one that most often kills a lower-level suite excavation.
  • Slope greater than 20% to 30% — Steep-slope DPA: a geotechnical engineer's report is required for foundation work. This is the one that most often kills a lower-level suite excavation.
  • Slope greater than 30% — Steep-slope DPA: a geotechnical engineer's report is required for foundation work. This is the one that most often kills a lower-level suite excavation.
PID011-690-232
Parcel5225B SUNSHINE COAST HWY (Sechelt)
WastewaterDistrict of Sechelt sewer service
WaterChapman system
Fire protectionSechelt FPA
District of Sechelt Zoning Bylaw 580 (gis.sechelt.ca) · fetched 2026-08-03T05:46 · meanings from zoning_rules.yaml (verify before relying)

Assessment

Assessed total$850,000
Land / improvements $840,000 / $10,000 (99% land — the higher, the more the value is in the dirt)
Assessed / ask 1.1 asking under assessment
BCA folio570.02874.000
BC Assessment via SCRD parcel layer · fetched 2026-08-03T06:45

Open questions

  • Confirm suite legality with the planning department — zone says yes, verify parcel specifics (parking, servicing, floor-area cap).
  • Built 1900 — oil-tank era. Ask for a tank scan or decommissioning certificate.
  • Rocky Beach Front, Escarpments and Slope Hazards: Steep-slope DPA: a geotechnical engineer's report is required for foundation work. This is the one that most often kills a lower-level suite excavation.
  • Slope greater than 20% to 30%: Steep-slope DPA: a geotechnical engineer's report is required for foundation work. This is the one that most often kills a lower-level suite excavation.
  • Slope greater than 30%: Steep-slope DPA: a geotechnical engineer's report is required for foundation work. This is the one that most often kills a lower-level suite excavation.
  • 161 days on market — ask the listing agent why it hasn't moved.

Notes